Experts discussed ways to improve access to innovative medicines for Russian patients

Progress in the treatment of diseases today is largely determined by the availability of innovative therapies. Without them, it is impossible to achieve the key targets of national programs aimed at increasing life expectancy and combating critical diseases.

Mikhail Tsyferov, President of Petrovax Pharm, took part in the session “Access to Innovations in the Pharmaceutical Industry” at the 5th Right to Health Congress, together with representatives of regulatory authorities, the pharmaceutical industry, and patient organizations. The participants discussed barriers and possible ways to improve the accessibility of innovative medicines in Russia.

According to Alexey Fedorov, an expert of the All-Russian Union of Patients, the pathway from registration to patient access for an innovative drug in Russia currently takes five to seven years:

“For instance, a medicine cannot be included in the State Healthcare Guarantee Program if it is not listed in the Clinical Guidelines. These guidelines are often revised only once every three to five years, which means that even if the drug is in the List of Essential Medicines, it still cannot reach routine clinical practice.”

One of the key issues hindering access to innovative therapies is the absence of a clear regulatory definition of an innovative medicinal product.

“It is impossible to create special regulatory conditions for a non-existent category. First, a category encompassing innovative medicines must be established,”
stressed Mr. Fedorov.

Elena Maksimkina, Director of the Federal Center for Planning and Organization of Drug Provision of Citizens of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, believes that to facilitate the inclusion of innovative drugs into the List of Vital and Essential Medicines (Essential Drug List, EDL), it is necessary to create a ‘longlist’. Medicines entering it would then undergo an innovation assessment. She noted that for candidates aiming at inclusion it would be desirable to meet the requirements of technological sovereignty, meaning they should be manufactured in Russia and contribute to the development of the domestic pharmaceutical industry.

In addition, Ms. Maksimkina proposed that when considering drugs for inclusion in the List of Vital and Essential Medicines (Essential Drug List, EDL), the actual status of patients in Russia should be taken into account—an approach proposed by Petrovax Pharm at the August meeting of the EDL Commission.

Mikhail Tsyferov, President of Petrovax Pharm, emphasized that although Russian innovative medicines have been authorized in recent years, their actual access to patients is delayed by 1.5–2 years due to lengthy procedures for inclusion in Clinical Guidelines, Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), and the EDL. This, he noted, reduces the efficiency of investments made by the Russian pharmaceutical industry.

"Today, the domestic pharmaceutical industry can cover a large share of the demand for generics, yet 80% of the budget spent on oncology drugs goes to original medicines, where the share of Russian products remains very small. Tellingly, in August 2025, when the EDL Expansion Commission reviewed 23 drugs for inclusion, only two were Russian-made, and only one of them was innovative. Innovation is expensive — it requires significant commitment and long-term vision,”
said Mr. Tsyferov.

The company president underlined that streamlining and shortening procedures for domestic companies to enter regulatory lists, Clinical Guidelines, and DRGs is essential to improve access to innovations. This would not only help save patients’ lives but also generate significant savings for the national healthcare system.

He added that for the domestic pharmaceutical industry, a long-term planning horizon (5–10 years) is crucial, as they enable significant price reductions. For example, until recently, there were only two molecules available for the treatment of Fabry disease. Petrovax Pharm has localized full-cycle production of a biosimilar of one of these molecules in Russia.

“Our agalsidase beta product costs almost half the price of its reference counterpart, and we are open to fair price competition. Another therapeutic analogue is twice as expensive, yet it is procured on the same terms as ours — sometimes financial efficiency is overlooked when choosing between therapies, even when there is no additional benefit for patients,”
noted Mr. Tsyferov.

To ensure an objective evaluation of treatment experience in real-world clinical practice, Petrovax Pharm is launching an observational study in collaboration with Sechenov University.

“We are ready to further reduce the price of our orphan drug if the market access is expanded. With the same budget, we could provide treatment to twice as many patients,”
said the president of Petrovax Pharm.

According to him, when including drugs in official lists, it is important to consider clinical efficacy, added therapeutic value, and the impact on the healthcare system. At the same time, the goals of import substitution and support for the domestic pharmaceutical industry must not be overlooked — the industry is already achieving what was unimaginable twenty years ago.

“I am confident that in ten years our capabilities will expand even further,”
concluded Mikhail Tsyferov.

At the conclusion of the discussion, participants have concurred that patients, physicians, and industry share a common goal — to improve public health. Therefore, every possible effort must be made to ensure that innovations become truly accessible.

Previous news

Petrovax Pharm reports 25% growth in export sales in H1 2025